Know who can actually do the work.
Most hiring and vendor decisions run on claims. A CV, a pitch deck, a portfolio link, a reference the candidate chose. Verified Talent Reports check what a person or company can actually prove they have done. You receive a short, clear report on who is genuinely suited to the work in question.
Claims are cheap. Proof is not.
Anyone can claim experience. AI writes a convincing CV in seconds. Portfolios borrow work. Case studies leave out the projects that failed. References come from people the candidate picked. None of that tells you the one thing you need to know: has this person or this company actually done this kind of work before, and can they show it?
What decisions usually run on
- A CV written to match the job ad
- A portfolio link you cannot check
- A pitch deck built to win the deal
- A reference the candidate chose themselves
What we check instead
- Work that can be independently verified
- Delivery on comparable projects, not adjacent ones
- Consistency between what is claimed and what the evidence shows
- Gaps where proof should exist but does not
A verification method only we run.
We built our own way of testing capability against proof. It is not software you can license and not a database anyone can buy. It is a proprietary method we run in-house on every report. We do not publish how it works. We publish what it finds: who has verifiable evidence of doing the work you need, and who only has a well-written claim.
Evidence over self-reporting
We weigh what can be verified. What someone says about themselves counts for little until the proof backs it up.
Every claim traced
Each capability we report on links back to evidence we checked. If we could not verify it, we say so.
A clear verdict
Every report ends with a plain recommendation. Proven, partially proven, or unproven for the specific work you named.
A short report. A straight answer.
No dashboards, no login, no hundred-page appendix. One document that says who can prove they have done the work, who cannot, and what we found in between.
Every report includes:
- Ranked verdicts. Every candidate or company assessed against the specific work you described, not a generic skill list.
- Evidence summary. What we verified, where the proof holds, and where it does not.
- Flagged gaps. Claims that no evidence supports get named plainly, before they cost you money.
- A recommendation you can act on. Who to shortlist, who to question further, who to pass on.
For the decisions that carry real cost.
You do not need a verified report for every hire. You need one when getting it wrong is expensive.
A hire you cannot afford to get wrong
The role carries real risk. A plant manager, a head of engineering, a compliance lead. We verify the finalists against proof before you commit.
Choosing between vendors or agencies
Every pitch deck says the same thing. We check which firm has actually delivered comparable work, and which one is stretching.
Validating a shortlist before the offer
You have narrowed it down to two or three names. A report on each tells you which one holds up under verification.
Three steps. 3 to 5 days.
Each report is a discrete engagement. You describe the work once and we handle the rest.
You define the work
Describe the task, project, or role. Send the candidates or companies you are weighing, or ask us to bring names.
We verify against proof
Our method checks every name against verifiable evidence of comparable work. No claim gets taken at face value.
You receive the report
A short document that says who is proven, who is not, and why. Delivered within 3 to 5 days.
Stop deciding on claims.
Tell us about the decision in front of you. We will tell you who can prove they have done the work.
Request a report